Stock Market Forum, Penny Stocks, FOREX, NASDAQ, AMEX, NYSE, Live Chat  

Sponsors
To be a sponsor Contact Us
Donations accepted to help with server fees and other expenses. Thank you!
Our Forums Motorized Bicycles Alternative Energy


Go Back   Stock Market Forum, Penny Stocks, FOREX, NASDAQ, AMEX, NYSE, Live Chat > Stock Market Investing Discussions - Stock Dividend Stocks > Stock Market Talk

Stock Market Talk Discuss the daily aspects of the Stock Markets. Everything from trading penny stocks to large stocks are discussed in detail with you stock market cats here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-23-2009, 06:04 AM
Stock Market Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Zotya is on a distinguished road
Default Quastions about naked-shorting

Hello!

First sorry about my bad english. I want to ask some questions about naked shorts.

I read a good article, but i dont understand it. :

I can't post link the article on the rollingstone tiltle: Wall Street's Naked Swindle

"The fact that short-sellers do not have to deliver their shares made it possible for two people at once to think they own a stock. Evil Hedge Fund X borrows 100 shares from Unwitting Schmuck A, and sells them to Unwitting Schmuck B, who never actually receives that stock: In this scenario, both Schmucks will appear to have full voting rights. "There's no accounting for share ownership around short sales," Trimbath says. "And because of that, there are multiple owners assigned to one share."

questions:
I am a hungarian student. In Hungary never allowed naked short. If I borrow shares, it will be accounting the central clearing house (named Keler rt), i think it's like DTC. If i make a naked short it isn't account in DTC? Whay dont know somebody who is the crazy investor (on the article) , who bet against Bear Stearns. aren't any all transaction registered in DTC? (keler registered all shorts (security landings), and buys)

"The fact that short-sellers do not have to deliver their shares made it possible for two people at once to think they own a stock. Evil Hedge Fund X borrows 100 shares from Unwitting Schmuck A, and sells them to Unwitting SchmuckB, who never actually receives that stock: In this scenario, both Schmucks will appear to have full voting rights. "There's no accounting for share ownership around short sales," Trimbath says. "And because of that, there are multiple owners assigned to one share."

how can hedge fund manipulate votings?

If i have a insider investor, who want to manipulate the corporate elections. I can do to land 100.000 share to 50 of my friends? So me and my friens buy free 5.000.000 votes? Or how?

I hope you are understand me

Zotya
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
could this be the end of naked shorting? Paul Stock Market Talk 5 05-07-2008 03:44 PM
Shorting Candidates Grizzums NASDAQ, AMEX, NYSE Stock Forum 8 09-22-2007 11:27 AM
Naked Shorting of Gold- yes- Gold itself! orange Stock Market Talk 3 07-29-2007 01:02 PM
OSTK - Overstock (Naked Short Litigation) Grizzums NASDAQ, AMEX, NYSE Stock Forum 4 07-23-2007 12:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC3
StockMarketCats.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27