TDCP share increase, Yes or no poll

[Aufan 1983]

Just curious how everyone is looking at this proxy:

[Quikshft]

For some reason I've received the voting material both electronically and from the snail mailer. The electronic option is available until 11:59 PM eastern the night before the meeting. How I vote is going to depend upon what happens between now and then I suppose.

[Razorback]

I voted no, but I've since decided I should have voted yes. I guess that's the part of me that wants to keep the dream alive a while longer. Though with nearly 250million shares outstanding, my 77k won't make much of a difference I suppose.

[BullRider]

Originally Posted by Razorback

I voted no, but I've since decided I should have voted yes. I guess that's the part of me that wants to keep the dream alive a while longer. Though with nearly 250million shares outstanding, my 77k won't make much of a difference I suppose.

You may not be the only one who has a 'change of heart'.

I really can't understand how anyone [who has been in this for a long time] could vote 'no'. I consider the additional shares a good thing---but what do I know

I'm still buying and trying to be patient.

My nightmare is that it will start to run on fantastic news and I won't have time to buy all the shares I want.

[Aufan 1983]

Originally Posted by BullRider

You may not be the only one who has a 'change of heart'.

I really can't understand how anyone [who has been in this for a long time] could vote 'no'. I consider the additional shares a good thing---but what do I know

I'm still buying and trying to be patient.

My nightmare is that it will start to run on fantastic news and I won't have time to buy all the shares I want.

I have been in tdcp for what I consider a long time and voted NO and almost had a change of heart as did Razor but then decided no I'm proud I cast my vote the way I did. Lets get it done or over with whichever comes first.

Don't think for a second that I don't want MK to be telling the truth about why the shares are needed but I just don't see it. This story is used with almost every fly by night penny stock around and it rarely works out to benefit shareholders. In 99% of the cases it only leads to more dilution and an eventual reverse split.

Maybe tdcp is the 1% but if you look at their track record I really doubt that is the case. One of Keatings favorite sayings is if he builds a company the stock price will follow so at this level what does it say about our company?

If MK had been honest and upfront keeping us informed then I would have been glad to cast a yes vote. That wasn't the case and at some point you have to say enough is enough.

[Spartan]

I'm a Yes. I haven't been on this train as long as most, but I'm not ready for it to end yet.